BC Government & Wet’suwet’en Chiefs Negotiate
Its rather obvious to know Horgan will not back down on the natural gas pipeline, and we also know the infamous chiefs need some serious face saving help from the NDP to get past the problem they now have with their own nation. So the LNG pipeline will remain a go, that’s the good news, now the bad news.
This is the first time since Horgan was elected, that I have lost faith in his ability to govern, based 100% on who he chose to negotiate, I will explain that in a minute.
The Office of the Wet’suwet’en have said No so many times, it’s hard to imagine they will convert that to a YES, unless Horgan is willing to give away the proverbial crown jewels to get the YES and considering who he mandated, it looks like this might have a scary ending for all of us.
If you think my fears are unfounded consider this, Horgan appointed the former head of West Coast Environmental Law, NDP’s Murray Rankin QC MP to do the negotiations. (check the link included) Now considering both West Coast Environmental Law and the Office of the Wet’suwet’en are funded by the American Tides Foundation as well as known for funding almost every shit disturbing protestor in Canada, it sending up all kinds of red flags!
If you think I have exaggerated, slide down the page and see just how badly these thugs interfere with our nation. I have posted a list of their accomplishments.
Rankin – a lawyer and adjunct law professor at the University of Victoria, who has devoted his career to investigating environmental law and aboriginal rights.
We have reason to be paranoid Murray Rankin is married to Linda Hannah whom he met at a founding board meeting of the Western Canada Wilderness Committee, so it looks like the dice are loaded with environmentalists from the word go.
As a life long environmentalist, and watching how we have been hijacked, this scares the hell out of me.
Do I trust Murray Rankin can do the job? About as much as I can trust a Supreme Court ruling where the Supreme Court justices are all former Hells Angels, and the case is about a member of Hells Angels. It’s giving a license to kill for the fox in the hen-house.
As I said, we do know the LNG line will proceed as planned, Horgan cannot get out of that one, so maybe they can turn the location of the blockade into a modern day hippie ranch for people who do not want to work for a living, all courtesy of the public’s dime. That should keep most of the hooligans there happy and if that’s not enough maybe they will get funding for a grow-op for happy headwater weeds.
No mention however as to the application of law in regards to excavators in the Morice River, can you imagine if CGL had done that? We need government to verify this did not happen or charge those who did it, if it did happen. It should not be hard to investigate, the water supply for the camp comes from somewhere, without a license, as well as the buildings, without certification or applications as required by law.
Horgan needs to come clean on what is already being offered, or why would the Office of the Wet’suwet’en say “A public announcement will follow after the official commencement of our discussions.” Remember this is before negotiations start, so the announcement is about something they already know but are not disclosing, inclusive of agreeing to allow the pipeline in exchange for, the massive question mark.
We need to know that Horgan will not interfere with the charges of breaching a court order by the B.C. Supreme Court unless the NDP want to make law DNA based law.
We also need to know if there is going to be land negotiations they should also include expert witness from all sides, not cherry picked information to get an NDP flavored outcome.
This has become an instance where the public would be better served with a court ordered settlement of land claims as opposed to a negotiated one, and all because of whom Horgan chose to negotiate.
To give the Office of the Wet’suwet’en anything more than they have already given all the other First Nations would set a dangerous precedent. Remember it was not government that walked away from the negotiating table, it was the Office of the Wet’suwet’en in 2009. It would be spitting in the faces of every First Nations group that worked in good faith to get the deals they now have.
Horgan needs to assure law abiding citizens that upholding the law is only way you can do business in our province, there should be no reward for breaking the law. All too often in the name of compromise we compromise integrity itself.
I would be the last person to deny the Wet’suwet’en of anything they rightfully have coming to them, in fact considering that all of the communities in the pipelines path are gifted by both industry and government with funds not offered to non-aboriginal communities, is that not enough privilege and payment? It’s not like this is a first and last time it will happen, it will happen every time traditional lands are used by industry.
I sincerely believe that the Wet’suwet’en people (not the chiefs) should see compensation for the wrongs that were done to them. If you’re going to offer compensation for the families who lived in the Houston area, it should specifically go to those families who trapped up in the Morice Lake area, not to anyone who never lived or trapped there.
None of it should go the hooligans who are squatting there on crown land now, they should be charged for trapping without licence.
If the descendants vacated the territory payment should be null and void, it sort of says that already in the Delgamuukw conclusion.
There are far too many Wet’suwet’en already disenfranchised by the system in play, hundreds can testify to how of the most money ends up in the pockets of a far too few in Moricetown. (Witset)
The public also has a right to know if Horgan is going to strip the Moricetown band counsel of the deals they negotiated in good faith, it’s a time for TRUTH first before reconciliation.
You cannot table reconciliation without tabling truth first, all of it not cherry picked truth.
We need reconciliation to include the general public, not a closed door deal between the Office of the Wet’suwet’en and the NDP. It’s time we had full hearings into the past that also allows for oral input for non-aboriginals before any more history is lost.
There are a lot of historical facts and knowledge still out there, unless the object is to wait till the truth dies, so certain people can make a ton of money under the table and call it land claims settled?
Nobody in the Bulkley Valley wants to deny anyone of what is rightfully theirs, but we do have a right to challenge what that might be.
If you want to see just how much the United States interferes with not only our election by way of influence groups, the Tides Foundation of America paid out the following. The Americans make a big deal out of Russian interference, but want us to accept it as a norm they can shaft us without repercussions.
Canada needs a new law to make the following illegal in our nation, we need to demand it in the upcoming election.
Since 2009, The Tides Foundation and Tides Canada Foundation have granted at least $40 million to organizations involved in anti-pipeline activism in the U.S., Canada and in Europe. Of that $40 million, at least $25 million was explicitly for anti-pipeline activity while $15 million went to the same organizations for general, related or unspecified purposes.
Below, here are excerpts of the U.S. tax returns showing more than 400 payments to 100 environmental and First Nations organizations that have been funded as part of the anti-pipeline Tar Sands Campaign.
Note: For 2014 and 2016, the excerpts provided are from a list of grants published by the Tides Foundation. These lists do not include the stated purpose for which the funds were granted. As such, it cannot be assumed that the payments made in 2014 and 2016 were necessarily for the Tar Sands Campaign.
1. 840450 Ltd. Fort Chipewayan, Alberta:
2. Alberta Environment Network Society, Edmonton, Alberta:
3. Association Quebecois de Luttre Contre la Pollution Atmosphérique
4. Beaver Lake Cree Nation
5. Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society
6. Canadian Youth Climate Coalition (via the Polaris Institute):
7. Canadian Climate Action Network (initially paid through the Sierra Club of Canada)
8. Centre for Policy Alternatives
9. Conservation Council of New Brunswick
10. Conservation for Responsible Economic Development (CRED)
11. Council of Canadians
12. DeSmogBlog Society - NOTE: This was for “opposition research-based journalism and distribution” and was paid via the Sustainable Markets Foundation.
13. DI Foundation - NOTE: This grant was made by Tides Canada Foundation
14. Driftwood Foundation
15. Dogwood Initiative:
-
- $40,654 (2008) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
- $46,639 (2009) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
- $65,000 (2010)
- $150,000 (2011)
- $75,000 (2012)
- $75,000 (2013)
- $201,752 (2014)
- $142,279 (2016)
- $163 763 (2017)
16. Ducks Unlimited Canada
Note: These payments were for the Athabasca Watershed Water Quality Research Project. These payments were for “research to document the extent of polycyclic hydrocarbon being released from Alberta tar sands operation and in support of the Taku NGO campaign.” Given the description of the purposes for which these funds were paid, it seems to me that these funds were granted as part of the Tar Sands Campaign. However, other than these payments, I have seen no evidence that Ducks Unlimited Canada is explicitly involved in the Tar Sands Campaign.
-
- $191,773 (2009) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
- NOTE: Tides Canada also paid Ducks Unlimited Canada $US-200,000 in 2008 for the same project.
- $191,773 (2009) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
17. Ecojustice
18. Ecology Action Centre
19. Ecology Ottawa
20. Environmental Defence Canada Inc.:
-
- $105,000 (2008) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
- $205,000 (2009)
- $250,000 (2011)
- $250,000 (2012)
- $212,500 (2013)
- $152,826 (2014)
- $116,063 (2015)
- $50,619 (2016)
- $36,465 (2017)
- $105,000 (2008) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
21. Equiterre
22. Forest Ethics Advocacy
-
- $783,603 (2009) - NOTE: This payment was made to Forest Ethics by Tides Canada Foundation
- $76,565 (2015)
- $58,607 (2016)
- $783,603 (2009) - NOTE: This payment was made to Forest Ethics by Tides Canada Foundation
23. Georgia Strait Alliance
24. Gitga’at First Nation
25. Global Forest Watch Canada:
26. Great Bear Rainforest Initiative (formerly The Turning Point Initiative)
27. Greenpeace Canada
28. Idle No More
29. Indigenous Climate Action
30. Indigenous Tar Sands Campaign (paid through the Polaris Institute)
-
- $9,750 (2008) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
- $40,000 (2013)
- $9,750 (2008) paid through Tides Canada Foundation
31. The Institute for New Economics Public Research - Note: These grants were made by Tides Canada Foundation
32. Iron and Earth
33. Keepers of the Athabasca:
34. Ktunaxa Nation Council Society
35. Leadnow
36. LI - The Leadership Institute - “Hollyhock”
37. Living Oceans Society:
38. Manitoba Energy Justice Coalition
39. Northwest Institute for Bioregional Research Society:
40. Pembina Foundation for Environmental Research
41. Pembina Institute:
42. Pipe Up Association:
43. Quebec Environmental Law Centre:
44. Raincoast Conservation Society
45. Respecting Aboriginal and Environmental Law (RAVEN) - for the Pull Together Campaign
46. Saik’Uz First Nation - for the Yinka Dene Alliance
47. Salal Foundation - NOTE: This grant was made by Tides Canada Foundation
48. Sierra Club of British Columbia Foundation:
49. Sierra Club of Canada Foundation:
50. Sisu Society:
51. Tides Canada Foundation
52. Tides Canada Initiative Society
-
- $202,608 (2008) (specifically for the “Tar Sands Education Campaign”)
- $87,713 (2014)
53. Transition Initiative Kenora
54. Tsleil-Waututh First Nation & Tsleil-Waututh Four Directions
55. T. Buck Suzuki Foundation
56. Tanker Free B.C. Society
57. Tyee Society
58. Water Matters Society of Alberta
59. West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation
60. Western Canada Wilderness Committee
61. World Wildlife Fund Canada
62. European Federation of Transport & the Environment:
63. Friends of the Earth Europe
64. 350.org
65. Backbone
66. Bold Nebraska
67. Boreal Songbird Initiative
68. Corporate Ethics International
69. Center for Energy Matters
70. Ceres Inc.
71. Earth Island Institute:
72. Earthjustice
73. Earthworks
74. Environment America Research & Policy, Washington DC:
75. Environmental Law & Policy Center, Chicago IL:
76. Environment Maine Research & Policy, Portland Maine:
77. Friends of the Earth:
78. ForestEthics (now STAND):
79. Fresh Energy
80. Indigenous Environmental Network
81. Honor The Earth
82. League of Conservation Voters
83. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Saint Paul, Minnesota:
84. MN350
85. Nebraska Easement Action Team, Hastings, Nebraska:
86. Nebraska Farmers Union, Lincoln, Nebraska:
87. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York NY:
-
- $200,000 (2009)
- $65,000 (2010)
- $200,000 (2010)
- $349,475 (2011)
- $165,000 (2012)
- $150,000 (2013)
- $100,000 (2014)
- $50,000 (2015)
- $518,750 (2016) plus $250,000 for the NRDC Action Fund
88. New Venture Fund, Washington DC:
89. Nextwave Foundation
-
- $977,118 (2011) NOTE: This was for purchase of shares in Hollyhock
- $119,274 (2015)
90. National Wildlife Federation, Washington DC:
91. Oil Change International:
92. Plains Justice:
93. Polaris Institute:
94. Progress Now:
95. Public Citizen:
96. Rainforest Action Network
97. Riverkeeper
98. Sierra Club Foundation
99. SumOfUs
-
- $358,750 (2014) NOTE: The purpose for which these funds were paid is not stated.
- $443,302 (2016)
100. Sustainable Markets Foundation
-
- $247,429 (2014) NOTE: The purpose for which these funds were paid is not stated.
101. Texas Fund for Energy & Environment
102. Tides Center’ Global Community Monitor
103. Western Organization of Resource Councils, Billings Montana:
104. UK Tar Sands Network (Platform, London):
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
In the event we are using copyrighted material, we are doing so within the parameters of the Fair Dealing exception of the Canadian Copyright Act.
On occasion we may use photos or videos without express permission for education purposes. If we have images on our website that do not incude a copyright users name, it could be for a number of reasons, the first is we might own the image, or it might published under Creative Commons, or we have no idea who owns the image as they may be reader submitted images, please be aware we are not using the images for profit or commercial use, and would be more than happy to give credits and or remove them based on legitimate request.
Fair Dealing is an exception in the Canadian Copyright Act that permits the use of other people's copyright protected work without permission or payment for the purpose of research, private study, education, satire, parody, criticism, review or news reporting.
Please verify if it is NOT a legally embedded photo or video before filing a complaint.
If you are the legitimate copyright owner and object to our usage of the images or want to have credits added, please contact us using our contact page. Please be specific in your description and location to where it is being used. Please supply I with evidence of where it was originally posted legally, and a link to where you claim we are using it.